Wow. I'd love to see one of these in person. I'm sure JVC will do a good job implementing most of the features.
I just don’t understand this move at all. JVC already has a 1080p eShift chip that has 40x the native resolution of that TI chip. This is the last thing I want to see JVC spending R&D on. I want to see them focus on brighter and brighter / higher contrast units. I want to see them make a 5000+ lumen unit to compete with the Sony 5000ES yet with even higher native contrast. Better and better HDR needs to be JVC’s focus. Which requires moving closer to Rec2020, much more light output, and much higher contrast on these true 4K chips. I would think they could drop a 2-3 year old eShift chip into a super cheap chassis, if they really wanted to break into the $1000-2000 market. Heck, B-stock 400s were being sold for like $1500. I bet that unit will far out preform anything this new DLP unit could offer.
This is the last thing I want to see JVC spending R&D on. I want to see them focus on brighter and brighter / higher contrast units.
My guess is there is barely or no real R&D involved given how many manufacturers are jumping on these selling at such a low cost. Probably takes just a little time with software configuration and expanding some abilities like lens shift that JVC is doing, etc. which probably doesn't take a ton of effort. If you take a look at the sub $3K threads at the other site, A LOT of Joe Six pack types think these XPR projectors are the second coming and they are being bought like crazy."I can finally get a 4K projector under $3000! OMG my dream has come true!"
Eventually the regular JVC line will move to native 4K and laser. With that move, I suspect we are looking at a price increase. Maybe JVC is looking for a product that they can have at the low end of their line, rather than just conceding those sales to other companies.