Def don’t like these nearly as much as the LotR but I upgraded anyhow Gotta put the new lumagen through its paces
Out of curiosity, did they include a 48 FPS version? With Jackson so involved with this release, I'd be kind of surprised if there wasn't, considering how attached he was to that format when it first came out.
No...that was for 3D and 48fps is not a supported refresh rate for displays.
Let me know if you think some of the VFX shots look a little too "fake." I didn't notice this as much in LOTR, but for some reason there were scenes that stuck out in this trilogy. Part of me wonders if it has to do with the higher res digital cameras versus 35mm film used in LOTR.
Greetings,I like these a bit more than Dave. We are in total agreement regarding the presentation. As for the visual effects, I think that the higher resolution is the reason why they standout. Not a negative but, a byproduct.Nice review Dave..Regards,
Ok, while I've said like many I'm not as big a fan of these as LOTR and actively dislike what they did in the 3rd movie, there is some good material that I wouldn't mind seeing. (And my wife likes some of this as much or more as LOTR - anything with little people thrills her and the number of dwarves traipsing through this... well...)So now the age old question is rearing its ugly head, lol. At what price do I sell my soul?