He's been asked many times for this information. I doubt he's going to provide any objective data to back up his claims after reading his last remarks where apparently Dave will need to do some type of Mission Impossible break-in to get the supposed data he has:BenQ LK990 First Impressions
" Dave will need to do some type of Mission Impossible break-in to get the supposed data he has " - you nearly sent coffee through my nose !
Quote from Javs on AVS Forum:.....A little sneaky stab, it reminded me of the LK990 vs my JVCs contrast looked in my room.......
Yeah what a shame you just aren’t capable of setting it up properly to get the best performance. Maybe you’ll get there someday.
Hows your permanent vacation from AVSForum going? I bet you are burning that you cant post there...
He's found Facebook as a way to peddle his magic potions.
I never understood the reason to make this projector into something that it wasn't. I mean, eventually the cat was going to get out of the bag. The deficiencies should have been embraced from the get-go and there wouldn't have ever been a controversy surrounding this projector. The argument could have been "sure it doesn't have great contrast, but if you're willing to live with that, you're going to be rewarded with an impressively sharp and bright projector that has a lot of pop". Instead we got this argument but will the added photos that made it seem as if this projector could go toe to toe with a Sony or JVC projector when content got dark.
Please show me ONE instance that I said it could go “toe to toe” with a JVC or Sony with native contrast?All I ever said was exactly what you wrote and that the blacks and contrast weren’t as bad as it was made out to be by the biased crowd. There are MANY who also agree with me.