Why on earth did this get you an infraction ?
Q: Does qualifying as "Native 4K" require that 8.3 million pixels be displayed simultaneously? A: in my opinion, yes. The standard up until now has been the number of pixels on the chip = the native resolution. Everything else could be considered " 4K compatible " .
I see some people say that XPR is "CTA certified to be native 4K" as if that means anything. I could tell you that my speakers are THX certified, but what does that have to do with being accurate to the source material?
I could see how your thread/post might be interpreted as antagonistic towards Runt even though you didn't mention him by name. Based on his history, I am sure he hit the report button more than once. Also, I am sure he doesn't want clarification on the subject.I noticed one CRT owner decided to go digital recently. He said he went with the Optoma because it is 4k. My guess is he received most of his info from the AVS thread. It is info like that that one could correct in the past so readers could make a more informed decision. It doesn't look like that is possible any more.
Here are some questions I consider relevant:Q: Are the XPR projectors "Native 4K"?
Q: If "No" to the above, and they put up 8.3 million pixels, why aren't they "Native 4K"?Q: Are the 8.3 million pixels with XPR projectors independent?
Q: Does qualifying as "Native 4K" require that 8.3 million pixels be displayed simultaneously?
Q: Would it change things if there was no pixel overlap? In other words, what if TI used a low fill ratio so that there was room leftover for othersub-frame to only fill in black parts of the image on screen?
Q: Is DLP projector model xxxx for well under $20k one that uses pixel shifting to qualify as 4K UHD, or does it have 8.3 millionmirrors on the DMD(s)?
Q: Are the 8.3 million pixels from the 1528p plus 2x eShift projectors "properly aligned", as one person posted?
Q: Is it irrelevant how the pixels are projected on the screen, as long as the correct number of pixels are projected, as oneperson posted?
Q: Does projector qualifying as "4K UHD" mean it will have better image quality than a projector that doesn't qualify for that higha resolution?
Q: There are reports that some Sony projectors with 8.3 million pixels on each chip can't do a single pixel checkerboardcorrectly. Are these "Native 4K"?
Why on earth did this get you an infraction ? Too much of a possibility for arguing ?Q: Does qualifying as "Native 4K" require that 8.3 million pixels be displayed simultaneously? A: in my opinion, yes. The standard up until now has been the number of pixels on the chip = the native resolution. Everything else could be considered " 4K compatible " .
I could see how your thread/post might be interpreted as antagonistic towards Runt even though you didn't mention him by name. Based on his history, I am sure he hit the report button more than once. Also, I am sure he doesn't want clarification on the subject.
I will give him a small amount of credit, if he were the type to report posts, I'm fairly certain I'd be banned already, considering how many times I've confronted him.OT - is there a way to multiquote with this forum software?
You may be correct, but I have only had posts removed and infractions incurred on those DLP threads.
Not sure what this means.
If you get 8 million unique pixels aligned properly at 60hz no matter how it's accomplished it's 4K.
Now here's a tough one, I want to say both yes and no. On the one hand, yes it's native 4K because it uses 4096x2160 panels, on the other if it fails to get all those to screen independently, well then it's not. I guess I'd say it is, with an asterisk.