MadVR Envy !

[AVSCraig]

The new MadVR Envy - 

[AVSCraig]

MadVR Envy demo - 

https://netorgft846492-my.sharepoint.com/:v:/g/personal/craig_avscience_com/EW8OCaFJdb1Ck8JdreWmMikBpLIcLHVdcrCG4nbVfioPlA?e=kqMWXN

[DLCPhoto]

Interesting.

As there is a change from scene to scene, it seems that there is a brief lag between when it starts to when the DTM (or whatever other processing is occurring) kicks in, kind of like when the Iris requires some time to open or close.

Is this representative of final performance, or is this just beta, or set up that way to demonstrate what the DTM does when it kicks in?

And does the JVC work the same way, with a brief lag as the DTM does its thing?

This is a bit distracting, and I'm hoping real world performance on either the Envy or JVC would be much smoother.

[Tom Bley]

Interesting.

As there is a change from scene to scene, it seems that there is a brief lag between when it starts to when the DTM (or whatever other processing is occurring) kicks in, kind of like when the Iris requires some time to open or close.

Is this representative of final performance, or is this just beta, or set up that way to demonstrate what the DTM does when it kicks in?

And does the JVC work the same way, with a brief lag as the DTM does its thing?

This is a bit distracting, and I'm hoping real world performance on either the Envy or JVC would be much smoother.

I was thinking the same thing, however, it could also be the camera the person was recording with.

[AVSCraig]

Probably my camera, but this is a beta version anyway. I don't recall seeing any lag. The JVC had no lag and my Lumagen doesn't either. It's seamless compared to a bad dynamic iris . 

[Tom Bley]

Probably my camera, but this is a beta version anyway. I don't recall seeing any lag. The JVC had no lag and my Lumagen doesn't either. It's seamless compared to a bad dynamic iris .

Awesome, thanks Craig.