2.35 vs. 2.40 'scope screens

[AVSCraig]

And then there is Seymour screen, which splits the difference with a 2.37:1 screen ratio !

[MrZoolittle]

So many choices I don't know what to do.

[AVSMike]

So many choices I don't know what to do.

If you want to discuss, give us a call. As you can see in my signature, we carry many different brands.

[DavidHir]

So many choices I don't know what to do.

When it comes down to 2:35 vs 2:4 (or anything between) don't sweat it.  It's all a tiny difference.

Mike, isn't it something like 8 pixels on the top and bottom as far as difference between the two ARs?

[AVSMike]

When it comes down to 2:35 vs 2:4 (or anything between) don't sweat it.  It's all a tiny difference.

Mike, isn't it something like 8 pixels on the top and bottom as far as difference between the two ARs?

Yes, you lose approximately 8 lines of pixels top and bottom. Small difference.

[AVSMike]

When it comes down to 2:35 vs 2:4 (or anything between) don't sweat it.  It's all a tiny difference.

Mike, isn't it something like 8 pixels on the top and bottom as far as difference between the two ARs?

Yes, you lose approximately 8 lines of pixels top and bottom. Small difference.

[MrZoolittle]

I have a couple of months, if I'm lucky, before my theater room is built so I have time to decide on 2.35 or 2.40.

[AVSMike]

I have a couple of months, if I'm lucky, before my theater room is built so I have time to decide on 2.35 or 2.40.

Since the 16:9 size is so much smaller, I would go with 2.35, so that your 16:9 image is slightly larger, than it would be with 2.40.